The Nyt Hospital Nordsjælland (NHN) is large hospital construction project for the citizens of North Zealand, Denmark.

The NHN hospital is owned by the Capital Region of Denmark, which is responsible for healthcare services, regional development, and public transport in the area. Covering 123,000 square meters, this is one of the largest construction sites in the country. The construction started in December 2019 and planned for completion at the end of 2026.

With the ambition to counterbalance many external challenges, the project is betting on new-generation construction technologies to help drive work productivity and eliminate unnecessary costs.

In October 2021, the Capital Region of Denmark purchased a 3D laser scanner to use with Imerso. The initial business case expected a target cost-savings of 4x times the total price of the software and scanning equipment used during the project. These savings were expected to stem from three main target areas:

• Reduction in construction claims for work errors,

• Faster and better site supervision efforts, and

• More efficient process for As-Built documentation.

The construction team implemented the routine in several processes and was able to rapidly demonstrate the value of this new source of data – and the requests for more scanning kept growing.

Results after 16 months

1. Increased efficiency in site supervision

One immediate improvement was seen in a higher efficiency to monitor the site status. The process to inspect numerous elements onsite, document any deviation accurately and make this information available to other project members drastically shortened.

 By comparing the speed of the new approach to traditional methods, it was found that Imerso’s method is over 15 times more efficient at monitoring the site status. Imerso uses less than 10% of the resources required by traditional methods and delivers much higher quality information. It would take an entire team more than a year using traditional inspection methods to achieve the same number of verifications of onsite installations that Anders and a couple of interns achieved in 65 days.

“Besides the measurable benefits from a risk perspective, we see that having a broad view on quality assurance also has a positive effect on the amount of rework, and therefore creating a more motivating working environment”, says Anders.

2. Reduced risk of costly Rework delays

After 16 months, Imerso had already prevented 440 issues of mixed severity, through their early detection, giving the project teams full context and details for a swift resolution before the problems escalate.

Cost savings per detection range wildly depending on the type of error, the disciplines involved, and the detection timing.

From analysing a wide sample of cases, the NHN team estimates a conservative cost-saving average of €14.000 per avoided issue.

According to Anders Kaas, Project Leader at NHN: "Instead of using the tool as a punishment tool for the contractor, we’ve set up a collaborative organisation with the contractors and consultants, where possible issues are discussed and further qualified in the site office.

This is done in a controlled environment, several months before the issue potentially results in a negative impact on-site, often affecting budget or time schedule."

3. Accurate As-Built documentation at every stage

By making 3D scanning as simple as taking a photo, the platform enables the NHN teams to capture every stage of the project with high-accuracy data, without the need for complicated workflows or costly third-party services.

NHN estimated that Imerso’s approach is 53 times faster at creating As-Built documentation, with orders of magnitude in better detail and quality, using less than 2% of the resources that traditional approaches need. With more recent scanners the documentation speed can further increase by five times.

In little over one year of using Imerso, and with still years to reach project completion, the NHN team estimates savings equivalent to 2% of the total construction budget.

These are costs that the project would have incurred in the form of construction rework, delays, waste, and lower worker productivity from using traditional methods.